1. AMUN-Ra The Hidden One1 Essays - Egyptian Gods, Mythology

1. AMUN-Ra "The Hidden One"1 As Zeus in Greek, Amun -Ra or Amon in Egypt is considered as Kings of Gods and Goddesses. Believed as the Father of the Pharaohs, Amun's female version is Amunet and is considered as the "The Female Hidden One". Forming the "Theban Triad", Amun and Mut along with their offspring Khonsu "Moon God" were worshipped throughout the ancient Egypt. Amun1 was not only worshipped in Egypt, but also outside Egypt as Amun -Ra after the amalgamation with the Sun God Ra of Ancient Egypt. 2. MUT "The Mother Goddess4" Mut meaning Mother in Egyptian language, is a primal deity in Egyptian who wears two crowns on her head each representing Upper and Lower Egypt. Also titled as "She who gives birth, but was herself not born of any", Mut is represented as Vulture in hieroglyphs. With different integration with various other deities Mut is portrayed as a Cat, Cobra, Cow and even Lioness. Mother of Khonsu, Mut with her different associations with many arbitraries was supported by many rulers of Egypt who followed the civilization. 3. OSIRIS "The King of Living" Considered as an oldest child of Earth God ZEB and Sky Goddess NUT, Osiris is worshipped as God of the afterlife as Egyptian believe there is life after death. Painted with green skin in the portrayals, Osiris was a god of vegetation which indicated Renewal and Growth and took in charge for the fertile flooding and the vegetation around the Nile banks.2 Osiris married his own sister Isis and was murdered by his own brother Seth. Despite being murdered by his own brother, Osiris was brought back to life by the magic of Isis for conceiving a child. Horus is the offspring of the Osiris and Isis, who avenged his father's death and arose as new king of Egypt while Osiris became the God of the Underworld and assisted for the afterlife of the Pharaohs and even the population. 4. ANUBIS "The Divine Embalmer" Before Osiris took over, Anubis patrolled the Afterlife. Being a psychopomps Anubis was the offspring of Ra and Nephthys was known for mummifying the dead ones and guiding the dead soul towards the afterlife. Having his skin tone black, he is symbolized as the dark Nile deposits which eased off farming and making it a successful one. With the head of a jackal and a body of the man Anubis was also symbolized Renaissance and the staining of the dead bodies after the embalming (Preserving the dead human remains). 5. RA "The God of Sun Radiance" A midday sun as identified Ra or Re holds important position in the Egyptian history. The God of Sun who has a sun disk around his head is believed to have created this world. Every sunrise and sunset was symbolized as renewal process. Portrayed as a falcon headed man, he and Horus shared an association which led him known as the Horus of the Horizon. Many ancient Egyptian gods were merged with Ra and many were created by him as well with some rival gods like Ptah, Isis and Apep . 6. HORUS "God of Vengeance" Horus has a special position in the Ancient Egypt. Considered as the offspring of the Osiris and Isis, he avenged his father's death and ruled Egypt. As per other myth he is considered as the brood of the Zeb and Nut, however this falcon headed man with the crown of red and white was worshipped as the God of Sky, War, Protection, Light. The eye of Horus or the Wedjat Eye was personified as the goddess Wadjet and was popularly known as "The Eye of the Ra". It symbolized that everything is being watched upon from above. 7. THOTH "God of Knowledge and Wisdom" An arbitrator who settled the disputes between good and evil, Thoth is considered as the god self created . Master of both physical and divine laws, he along with his counterpart Ma'at maintained the universe by the mastery in calculations. Egyptians acknowledge him as an author of science, philosophy and magic. An ibis or baboon headed man was considered to be the most learned god in the ancient history. Earlier considered as moon god

Free Essays on Jackson And His Democrats

Jackson and his Democrats The election of Andrew Jackson to the office of president in 1828 signified the changing dynamic of American politics. From the time of it’s institution in 1787, the United States government has proved again and again its ability to mutate to fit the needs of the times. Just as political factions polarized in the late 18th century, new ones began to develop; which although based in some of the same principles as the original parties, were shaped by the events of the day. One of these new political subdivisions to form contained individuals known as Jacksonian Democrats, led clearly by Andrew Jackson, which professed themselves as champions of the common man, the constitution, and equality. As history will go to show, it is opinion that will determine whether these democrats were in reality the altruistic crusaders of liberty they projected themselves as. The Jacksonian democrats, although attackers of the entrenched wealthy class that seemed to have a stranglehold on the body politic and apparent defenders of the proletariat, were also driven by the bias of personal agendas. During this point in the colorful timeline that is American History, the most dramatic change in the nature of the government was the perception of political parties. George Washington’s Farewell Address denounced the formation of what he believed to be evil entities that stagnated the democracy that he had worked hard to help create. Rather than being condemned, at this point in history political parties moved out of the spectrum of being an â€Å"evil† to something that facilitates democracy and protects the rights of certain groups. The Working Men’s Declaration of Independence [Document A] by George Henry Evans is a demonstration of this changed belief. According to Evans, the function of a political party is to help guard future security of its people. This changing partisan view was capitalized by Jackson i... Free Essays on Jackson And His Democrats Free Essays on Jackson And His Democrats Jackson and his Democrats The election of Andrew Jackson to the office of president in 1828 signified the changing dynamic of American politics. From the time of it’s institution in 1787, the United States government has proved again and again its ability to mutate to fit the needs of the times. Just as political factions polarized in the late 18th century, new ones began to develop; which although based in some of the same principles as the original parties, were shaped by the events of the day. One of these new political subdivisions to form contained individuals known as Jacksonian Democrats, led clearly by Andrew Jackson, which professed themselves as champions of the common man, the constitution, and equality. As history will go to show, it is opinion that will determine whether these democrats were in reality the altruistic crusaders of liberty they projected themselves as. The Jacksonian democrats, although attackers of the entrenched wealthy class that seemed to have a stranglehold on the body politic and apparent defenders of the proletariat, were also driven by the bias of personal agendas. During this point in the colorful timeline that is American History, the most dramatic change in the nature of the government was the perception of political parties. George Washington’s Farewell Address denounced the formation of what he believed to be evil entities that stagnated the democracy that he had worked hard to help create. Rather than being condemned, at this point in history political parties moved out of the spectrum of being an â€Å"evil† to something that facilitates democracy and protects the rights of certain groups. The Working Men’s Declaration of Independence [Document A] by George Henry Evans is a demonstration of this changed belief. According to Evans, the function of a political party is to help guard future security of its people. This changing partisan view was capitalized by Jackson i...

All parents should attend government parenting classes Essay

All parents should attend government parenting classes - Essay Example Nevertheless, a lot of queries might be brought up as to whether it is logical for parents to be left to raise their children without any interference given that there has been an increase in vices such as substance abuse, bulling and sometimes fatal fights. For new parents and those who have trouble when it comes to raising their children, parenting classes are a potential solution to helping them. Although some fear that parenting classes increase the socio-economic gap between citizens, government parenting classes will be beneficial in; mitigating the ripple effects of poor parenting on the society, upholding children’s rights to getting quality parenting and standardizing parenting information for reliability and consistency. All parents should go to government sponsored parenting classes because they will help reduce the negative impacts that bad parenting has on the society as a whole. According to Casey and Kirby (2006), in matters regarding the bringing up of its futu re citizens, the government has a firm financial, practical and moral concern. This is the reason why most democracies that are liberalist in nature extend pricey and broad child support systems in order to assist parents in the upbringing of young individuals who will turn out to be respectful, responsible, active and upright members of the society. These support systems include; arrangements for parental leave, nursery care that is free and payments for child support. Casey and Kirby (2006) also raise the contention that preventive and proactive action brings about the best outcomes as opposed waiting to deal with the problems after they arise. The successfulness and cohesiveness of the next generations could be ensured by the implementation of mandatory parenting classes hence raising parenting standards for the benefit of current and future generations. If all parents attended government parenting classes, children’s rights to getting quality parenting will be upheld. Dow ard (2006) argues that making parenting classes mandatory would in a great way aid in the prioritization of the children’s best interests without putting a restriction on the educational choices of these parents. This is because it might not be possible to put into place supervisory or legal systems that would provide encouragement to parents to take better care of their children. While merely having an effect on parents at a minimal degree, parenting classes would certainly aid parents in determining and acquiring knowledge as to what is considered to be good for their children; this would in turn enforce the right of a child to an upbringing that is decent. Bortolotti and Cutas (2009, p.17) give the argument that dealing with bad parenting will in effect cub child social exclusion. For instance, 90% of juvenile wrongdoers have been known to have a history of behavioural issues as children. Moreover, according to LaFollette (1980, p. 24), there are some instances in which a child’s failings are clearly as a result of poor parenting. For example, a fourteen year old boy or girl with poor health, a record of crime and no educational qualifications has almost surely been failed by his/her parents. It is therefore better if these classes are made mandatory for all parents since the government has no means of determining in advance which parents will specifically struggle in raising his/her child. For the betterment of the society at large, a